Labour is assured it might probably show Sir Keir Starmer didn’t break lockdown guidelines after he pledged to supply his resignation if issued with a hard and fast penalty discover by police.
Sir Keir has come below strain over an occasion in Durham in April 2021 with occasion colleagues when he was filmed having a drink and a takeaway curry was ordered.
In a dramatic assertion on Monday, the Labour chief mentioned he would do the “proper factor” if issued with a superb for breaking COVID guidelines.
The transfer locations his future within the fingers of Durham Police after it was introduced final week officers would reopen an investigation into the occasion.
Politics Hub: PM guarantees to fight ‘aftershocks of COVID’ in Queen’s Speech
Nevertheless, Labour sources imagine they’ve proof that it was a piece occasion and that these current had been taking a break to eat whereas working late on preparations for the Hartlepool by-election.
A report within the Guardian newspaper acknowledged that the occasion has compiled time-stamped logs from messaging chats, paperwork and video edits displaying they carried on working till 1am – effectively after when the takeaway was delivered.
It added that detectives investigating the alleged breach of lockdown guidelines are contemplating interviewing the Labour chief head to head.
“We have now been completely clear that no guidelines had been damaged. We’ll present documentary proof that folks had been working earlier than and after stopping to have meals,” a Labour supply advised the Guardian.
Please use Chrome browser for a extra accessible video participant

3:22
Labour chief Sir Keir Starmer has mentioned he’ll do ‘the correct factor and step down’- if the police problem a hard and fast penalty discover.
‘No legal guidelines had been damaged’
Talking on Monday, Sir Keir, who has been a fierce critic of Boris Johnson’s rule-breaking in Downing Avenue, mentioned he was “completely clear that no legal guidelines had been damaged” in his case.
However he added: “If police determine to problem me with a hard and fast penalty discover, I might after all do the correct factor and step down.”
Pressed on whether or not he would give up if it was decided that there was a breach of the foundations however he’s not issued with a superb, Sir Keir mentioned he had not damaged the foundations and added: “The penalty for a COVID breach is a fixed-penalty discover, that is a matter of legislation, and I’ve set out what the place is in relation to that.”
Labour’s deputy chief Angela Rayner, who was on the occasion too, additionally mentioned no guidelines had been damaged and made an identical pledge that she would give up if fined.
On the time, COVID guidelines banned family mixing indoors, aside from working.
Over the weekend a leaked memo obtained by the Mail on Sunday revealed the meal was pre-planned, in distinction to Labour’s earlier declare that it was a call on the night time as “nowhere served meals”.
On Monday, Sir Keir pulled out of a deliberate think-tank occasion as strain mounted.
However in a hastily-arranged information convention later that day, the Labour chief agreed to face broadcast journalists to reply rising questions on how he would possibly reply if discovered to have damaged the legislation.
‘I imagine in honour’, says Starmer
In a press release, he sought to attract a distinction between his place and that of Mr Johnson, who has already acquired a hard and fast penalty discover after a Met Police investigation into alleged lockdown breaches in Downing Avenue and Whitehall in 2020 and 2021.
That investigation, through which greater than 50 fines have already been introduced, is continuous.
Sir Keir mentioned: “I imagine in honour, integrity and the precept that those that make the legal guidelines should observe them.
“I imagine that politicians who undermine that precept undermine belief in politics, undermine democracy, undermine Britain.
“I’m completely clear that no legal guidelines had been damaged – they had been adopted always.
“I merely had one thing to eat whereas working late within the night as any politician would do days earlier than an election.
“The prime minister has chosen to not resign, however that, not solely has he damaged the legislation that he made, however 50 fines being imposed in relation to the office that he’s answerable for.
“That’s his selection. However it’s crucial that the general public do not suppose that every one politicians are the identical and that’s the reason I’ve set out my place when it comes to honour and integrity.”
Evaluation by Jon Craig, chief political correspondent
It had already been known as a “prawn Balti-matum”. However Sir Keir Starmer’s pledge to give up if he is fined over “beer-gate” appears like a determined gamble.
After being backed right into a korma for days, the Labour chief definitely got here out preventing. However he appeared tense and his nine-minute assertion was clearly rehearsed.
We now know why he pulled out of a speech to the coverage wonks of the Institute for Authorities and – rudely, his critics would declare – missed the memorial service for former Tory minister James Brokenshire.
His assertion was clearly an try to set the report straight. However even his most loyal supporters would say it was a press release he ought to have made weeks in the past.
Angela Rayner – who Labour initially denied had been current on the “beergate” curry, later mentioned he’d additionally give up if she’s fined. Guess she’s delighted at being dragged again into the Starmer drama.
As he gripped the lectern throughout his monologue at Labour HQ, there was a change of tone from Sir Keir’s earlier complacent and deceptive statements on the “beergate” allegations.
The cost towards the Labour chief from his political opponents has been self-righteous hypocrisy. And he could also be an skilled lawyer, however he forgot the forged iron rule of politics: it is not the offence, it is the cover-up.
After his protestations of innocence and pleadings about “honesty” and “integrity”, the important thing query was requested as he tried to flee by Sky’s tenacious political editor, Beth Rigby.
What would Sir Keir do if Durham Police rule that he broke the foundations however is not fined, Beth requested. Bear in mind, the pressure mentioned it would not superb Dominic Cummings over his “eyesight” drive to Barnard Fortress as a result of it does not superb folks retrospectively.
Sir Keir’s reply: he’ll solely give up if he is fined, a solution that will not fulfill his critics and will result in tears on his pilau within the weeks and month forward.
Talking on Sky Information on Tuesday, Policing Minister Package Malthouse mentioned Durham Constabulary will meet “excessive requirements” no matter any alleged strain on them as they examine the Labour chief.
“Durham police will function professionally to the excessive requirements we anticipate of them regardless of what the exterior goings-on are round this case,” he mentioned.
“We have to go away them the area and time to do their job.”
The COVID-19 Bereaved Households for Justice UK marketing campaign group, which has been essential of the federal government’s pandemic insurance policies, tweeted: “That is the correct determination by Keir Starmer and in distinction to Boris Johnson, reveals integrity, decency and respect to the bereaved.”